Drilling and water quality


Newspaper: Pa. drilling contaminated water supplies at 161 locations Comment Email Print Published: Sat, June 1, 2013 @ 12:00 a.m. Associated Press scranton, pa. Oil and gas development damaged the water supplies of at least 161 Pennsylvania homes, farms, churches and businesses between 2008 and fall 2012, according to state records obtained by a newspaper. The Scranton Times-Tribune first requested the records in late 2011 under the Right to Know law, but the Department of Environmental Protection mounted legal challenges and didn’t release the records until late last year. The Times-Tribune analyzed nearly 1,000 letters and enforcement orders written by DEP officials. The determination letters are sent to water-supply owners who complained that drilling activities polluted or diminished the flow of water to their wells. About 17 percent of the investigations across the five-year period found that oil and gas activity disrupted water supplies either temporarily or seriously enough to require companies to replace the source. According to the letters, faulty wells channeled natural gas into the water supplies for 90 properties. Three of those cases were tied to old wells, one of which caused an explosion at a home after gas entered through a floor drain and accumulated in a basement. The department repeatedly argued in court filings that it does not count how many determination letters it issues or track where they are kept in its files. The DEP also has fought efforts by The Associated Press and other news organizations to obtain similar records. The state’s records suggest that drilling-related contamination incidents increased with the start of the Marcellus Shale drilling boom, with about 4,000 wells producing gas since 2008. Drilling damaged water supplies at a rate of more than 16 cases per year during the past five years, but for the 20 years before 2008, the rate was fewer than three per year. The department’s water testing and reporting protocols have come under scrutiny in recent months as environmental activists and homeowners whose drilling-related complaints were dismissed have come to doubt the accuracy of DEP findings. In January, state Auditor General Eugene DePasquale announced that his office is conducting a performance audit of the DEP’s water-testing program. Department spokesman Kevin Sunday told the Times-Tribune the increase in problems can be attributed to a shift from drilling in western areas with a long history of oil and gas extraction to central and eastern regions where the geology is less studied. Those factors mean “that there will be an adjustment period” during which drillers refine practices. Sunday added that the records suggest that tougher state regulations on drilling have reduced the number of problems. The department counted five contamination cases in 2012 compared with 18 cases in 2011, but some of those cases involved more than one drinking-water source. Some of the problems were short-lived. The department described 20 of the confirmed contamination incidents as temporary. Kathryn Klaber, Marcellus Shale Coalition CEO, said the state and natural-gas industry have focused on strengthening standards for drilling. She said the industry has worked to investigate and respond to contamination complaints, including providing drinking water to homeowners. The environmental protection department’s records also describe an array of problems that exist in Pennsylvania water supplies unrelated to oil and gas exploration, such as high metal, salt and methane content and bacteria from surface water or nesting creatures invading poorly built water wells. A 2011 Penn State study found that about 40 percent of water wells it tested before gas-well drilling failed at least one federal drinking water standard. Pennsylvania is one of only a few states that doesn’t have private water-well construction standards. Other contamination in the records involved drilling-related road construction in two cases and construction of a large water-storage pond at another, while pipeline construction twice polluted water supplies with sediment. Seven water supplies were contaminated by stray cement or rock waste displaced by drilling. Critics of natural-gas drilling say the ambiguity left by DEP investigations means the state needs more robust tools and a stronger will to pursue clues about contamination. Anthony Ingraffea, an engineering professor at Cornell University, said the environmental protection department’s record-keeping doesn’t answer the question of “how many individual families’ private drinking-water wells have been contaminated by oil and gas activities.” “No one knows the answer,” Ingraffea said.

Advertisements

Like it or not we all have to have clean drinking water on a daily basis.


Billions Needed for Drinking Water Infrastructure

The fifth Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey and Assessment (DWINSA) was released by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) last week.  The survey was conducted in 2011 in order to “document the 20-year capital investment needs of the public water systems that are eligible to receive Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) monies”.

The survey is conducted every four years under the direction of the Safe Drinking Water Act and consisted of 52,000 community water systems and 21,400 not-for-profit noncommunity water systems.   The results are somewhat staggering.

 

Over the next 20 years, the survey estimated that $384.2 billion is needed in improvements for our nation’s drinking water infrastructure.  These improvements include thousands of miles of pipes and thousands of treatment plants, storage tanks and water distribution systems.  It is important to note that the survey only includes projects eligible to receive DWSRF funds and therefore excludes projects related to dams, raw water reservoirs, future growth and fire protection.

More specifically, the survey breaks down the $384.2 billion need into the following project types:

  • Distribution and transmission: $247.5 billion to replace or refurbish aging or deteriorating lines
  • Treatment: $72.5 billion to construct, expand or rehabilitate infrastructure to reduce contamination
  • Storage: $39.5 billion to construct, rehabilitate or cover finished water storage reservoirs
  • Source: $20.5 billion to construct or rehabilitate intake structures, wells and spring collectors
  • Other: $4.2 billion

“A safe and adequate supply of drinking water in our homes, schools and businesses is essential to the health and prosperity of every American,” said EPA Acting Administrator Bob Perciasepe. “The survey EPA released today shows that the nation’s water systems have entered a rehabilitation and replacement era in which much of the existing infrastructure has reached or is approaching the end of its useful life. This is a major issue that must be addressed so that American families continue to have the access they need to clean and healthy water sources.”