EPA – Environmental Protection Agency – Things that make you go HMMMMMMMMM


EPA: It’s “Acceptable” For 1 in 28 To Get Sick From the Beach

                

EPA: It’s “Acceptable” For 1 in 28 To Get Sick From the Beach                    

    

It would be ok for 1 in 28 people to get sick after swimming at the beach  according to a new proposal from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). That is, at least one of the  people on the beach with you is likely to end up with vomiting, diarrhea  with fever and stomachache, or nausea accompanied by a fever, under the EPA’s  proposed guidelines for levels of beach pollution.

If that makes you feel less than inclined to go for an ocean swim, it should.  As the National Resource  Defense Council‘s Switchboard explains, the Beaches  Environmental Assessment and Coastal Health Act of 2000 required that, by  2005, the EPA would issue recreational beach criteria that would be “for  the purpose of protecting human health” at beaches on the coasts and the Great  Lakes. But the EPA failed to meet the deadline, leading the NRDC to sue and gain  a court order requiring the EPA to follow the law.

The EPA has devised a proposal but one that leaves much to be desired to  protect public health. At the levels of beach contamination that the EPA  seeks to allow, 36 out of 1,000 people will end up with diarrhea,  vomiting, nausea and stomachache. It is apparently “acceptable” for that many  people (1 out of 28) to become ill after swimming at the beach.

Rather than trying to tighten regulations on beach pollution and seeking to  ensure that fewer people become ill with some highly unpleasantly illnesses, the  EPA is letting the level of allowable contamination stay the same. The only  change, says NRDC, is that we know more about such illnesses (that the diarrhea  could also come with fever). But such is not enough:

… the EPA must address all known risks to human  health. The EPA’s proposal fails to do so as it sweeps the most fundamental and  alarming point under the rug: knowingly allowing one in 28 people to get sick is  not protecting public health, nor is it legal.

Furthermore, the EPA seems also to be cutting corners in the ways it measures  pollution, by allowing “water test results at beaches to be averaged over a  period as long as 90 days” and by decreeing that one in every four samples must be beyond safe  levels before the EPA will call for a reduction in beach pollution. Such  measures do not adequately protect beachgoers. Says NRDC:

This is entirely incompatible with the Clean  Water Act’s goal of “fishable/swimmable” waters. Quite simply, no one swims,  paddles, or fishes in “average” water. They come into contact with water in  whatever condition they find it at that particular time.

Of course one faces risks when swimming in the ocean or in a lake. But the  EPA needs to live up to its name and look out for our oceans and lakes and  ensure that pollution is not simply at “acceptable” levels, but at ones that are  safe and that mean we can expect a sunburn at worst (not some equivalent of  Montezuma’s revenge) after a visit to the beach.

Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/epa-its-acceptable-for-1-in-28-to-get-sick-from-the-beach.html#ixzz2ZoZiYi1U

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s