Should fracking fluids be proprietary – I think not.


California officials wrestle with handling trade secrets on fracking

 
fracking

                                            A fracking facility with working wells beside potato fields in Shafter, Calif.                                                 (Jose Luis Villegas / Sacramento Bee / June 10, 2013)                                        

                                

By Patrick McGreevy

July 17, 2013, 1:17 p.m.

 

                                                                                    

State officials have been flooded with more than 20,000 comments and suggestions regarding proposed regulations of a controversial oil and gas drilling technique known as fracking, officials said Wednesday.

Members of the California Water Commission voiced concerns of their own Wednesday about whether the state should treat the recipes for some fracking liquids as trade secrets, not to be disclosed to the public.

Fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, involves the injection of water, sand and chemicals into the ground to break up rock formations and release the oil and gas trapped inside.

In a briefing Wednesday, Tim Kustic, the state oil and gas supervisor, told the commission that proposed regulations would require companies to notify the state at least 30 days before they begin fracking, with the information publicly posted no more than seven days later. Fracking is currently permitted in California.

Companies would also have to disclose to state regulators the materials used in fracking, but Kustic told the commission that his office was wrestling with rules to apply when companies claim the formulas for their fracking solutions are trade secrets.

Commissioner Kimberly Delfino voiced concern that treating some information as trade secrets might prevent regional water quality agencies from looking for and identifying groundwater contamination from fracking.

Kustic said his office was developing rules for when trade secrets would have to be shared with regulators and a process to make sure oil firms are not hiding information behind rules protecting trade secrets without justification.

Even if some information on the recipe or method of combining chemicals is deemed a trade secret, the regulations would make sure state officials have access to it so they can exercise oversight. “We would hold it [information]. We would evaluate it,” Kustic told the board.

A new draft of regulations will be released this summer with final approval, after additional hearings, likely in mid-2014, well after the state Legislature is expected to act on its own proposed regulations.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s